You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cytological features of thyroid medullary carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology, January 1995
|
| DOI | 10.5795/jjscc.34.116 |
| Authors |
Ichiro KAWANO, Emiko TANIGUCHI, Kennichi KAKUDO, Akira MIYAUCHI, KUMA Kanji |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#17,283,763
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology
#19
of 32 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,686
of 76,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 13 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them