You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why do some bird species incorporate more anthropogenic materials into their nests than others?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rstb.2022.0156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zuzanna Jagiello, S. James Reynolds, Jenő Nagy, Mark C. Mainwaring, Juan D. Ibáñez-Álamo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 6 | 26% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 4% |
| Grenada | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 504. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#52,240
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#31
of 7,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,274
of 368,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.