You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fetal atomic bomb survivor dosimetry using the J45 series of pregnant female phantoms with realistic survivor exposure scenarios: comparisons to dose estimates in the DS02 system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00411-023-01032-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Colin J. Paulbeck, Tatsuhiko Sato, Sachiyo Funamoto, Choonsik Lee, Keith T. Griffin, Harry M. Cullings, Stephen D. Egbert, Akira Endo, Nolan E. Hertel, Wesley E. Bolch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,778,781
of 24,051,764 outputs
Outputs from Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
#328
of 455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,237
of 294,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,051,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 455 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them