↓ Skip to main content

Using Concept Mapping to Enhance the Research Interview

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Qualitative Methods, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
321 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using Concept Mapping to Enhance the Research Interview
Published in
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, March 2010
DOI 10.1177/160940691000900106
Authors

Ian M. Kinchin, David Streatfield, David B. Hay

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 301 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 78 24%
Student > Master 56 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 8%
Researcher 21 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 5%
Other 71 22%
Unknown 53 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 95 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 27 8%
Computer Science 24 7%
Engineering 16 5%
Arts and Humanities 14 4%
Other 88 27%
Unknown 57 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Qualitative Methods
#830
of 1,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,329
of 102,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Qualitative Methods
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.