↓ Skip to main content

The global lead isotope system: Toward a new framework reflecting Earth's dynamic evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Earth-Science Reviews, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 1,810)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
26 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The global lead isotope system: Toward a new framework reflecting Earth's dynamic evolution
Published in
Earth-Science Reviews, August 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104483
Authors

Luc S. Doucet, Zheng-Xiang Li, Denis Fougerouse, Hugo K.H. Olierook, Hamed Gamaleldien, Christopher L. Kirkland, Michael I.H. Hartnady

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Unspecified 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 70%
Unspecified 2 10%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 221. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 July 2023.
All research outputs
#174,053
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Earth-Science Reviews
#20
of 1,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,407
of 358,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth-Science Reviews
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,370 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.