↓ Skip to main content

The Cellular and Synaptic Architecture of the Mechanosensory Dorsal Horn

Overview of attention for article published in Cell, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
519 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Cellular and Synaptic Architecture of the Mechanosensory Dorsal Horn
Published in
Cell, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2016.12.010
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The deep dorsal horn is a poorly characterized spinal cord region implicated in processing low-threshold mechanoreceptor (LTMR) information. We report an array of mouse genetic tools for defining neuronal components and functions of the dorsal horn LTMR-recipient zone (LTMR-RZ), a role for LTMR-RZ processing in tactile perception, and the basic logic of LTMR-RZ organization. We found an unexpectedly high degree of neuronal diversity in the LTMR-RZ: seven excitatory and four inhibitory subtypes of interneurons exhibiting unique morphological, physiological, and synaptic properties. Remarkably, LTMRs form synapses on between four and 11 LTMR-RZ interneuron subtypes, while each LTMR-RZ interneuron subtype samples inputs from at least one to three LTMR classes, as well as spinal cord interneurons and corticospinal neurons. Thus, the LTMR-RZ is a somatosensory processing region endowed with a neuronal complexity that rivals the retina and functions to pattern the activity of ascending touch pathways that underlie tactile perception.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 519 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 513 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 112 22%
Researcher 97 19%
Student > Bachelor 52 10%
Student > Master 40 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 5%
Other 83 16%
Unknown 111 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 201 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 6%
Engineering 16 3%
Other 35 7%
Unknown 121 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2025.
All research outputs
#1,620,384
of 32,787,243 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#5,430
of 19,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,563
of 450,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#91
of 142 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,787,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 142 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.