↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines for microbiome studies in renal physiology

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Renal, Fluid & Electrolyte Physiology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines for microbiome studies in renal physiology
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Renal, Fluid & Electrolyte Physiology, July 2023
DOI 10.1152/ajprenal.00072.2023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rikeish R Muralitharan, Matthew Snelson, Guillaume Meric, Melinda T Coughlan, Francine Z Marques

Abstract

Gut microbiome research has increased dramatically in the last decade, including in renal health and disease. The field is moving from experiments showing mere association to causation using both forward and reverse microbiome approaches, leveraging tools such as germ-free animals, treatment with antibiotics, and faecal microbiota transplantations. However, we are still seeing a gap between discovery and translation that needs to be addressed, so that patients can benefit from microbiome-based therapies. In this guideline paper, we discuss the key considerations that affect the gut microbiome of animal and clinical studies assessing renal function, many which are often overlooked, resulting in false-positive results. For animal studies, these include suppliers, acclimatisation, baseline microbiota and its normalisation, littermates and cohort/cage effects, diet, sex differences, age, circadian differences, antibiotics and sweeteners, and models used. Clinical studies have some unique considerations, which include sampling, gut transit time, dietary records, medication, and renal phenotypes. We provide best practice guidance on sampling, storage, DNA extraction, and methods for microbial DNA sequencing (both 16S rRNA and shotgun metagenome). Finally, we discuss follow-up analyses, including tools available, metrics, and their interpretation, and the key challenges ahead in the microbiome field. By standardising study designs, methods and reporting, we will accelerate the findings from discovery to translation and result in new microbiome-based therapies that may improve renal health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Researcher 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Lecturer 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 11%
Unspecified 1 11%
Design 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,078,742
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Renal, Fluid & Electrolyte Physiology
#89
of 2,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,185
of 366,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Renal, Fluid & Electrolyte Physiology
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,806 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.