↓ Skip to main content

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis of Dandy-Walker-Like Syndrome in a Wire-Haired Miniature Dachshund

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis of Dandy-Walker-Like Syndrome in a Wire-Haired Miniature Dachshund
Published in
Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, May 2013
DOI 10.1292/jvms.12-0550
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yui KOBATAKE, Takayoshi MIYABAYASHI, YADA Naoko, Shingo KACHI, OHTA George, Hiroki SAKAI, Sadatoshi MAEDA, Hiroaki KAMISHINA

Abstract

A 12-week-old female Wire-haired miniature dachshund presented with non-progressive ataxia and hypermetria. Due to the animal's clinical history and symptoms, cerebellar malformations were suspected. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected bilateral ventriculomegaly, dorsal displacement of the cerebellar tentorium, a defect in the cerebellar tentorium and a large fluid-filled cystic structure that occupied the regions where the cerebellar vermis and occipital lobes are normally located. The abovementioned cystic structure and the defect in the cerebellar tentorium were comparable to those seen in humans with Dandy-Walker syndrome. However, the presence of the cystic structure in the occipital lobe region was unique to the present case. During necropsy, the MRI findings were confirmed, but the etiology of the condition was not determined.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 14 28%
Other 9 18%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 29 58%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Linguistics 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#2,043
of 3,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,691
of 207,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
#18
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,546 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,619 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.