↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
79 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Individual Participant Data Network Meta-Analysis of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Carcinoma
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, July 2023
DOI 10.1200/jco.22.02279
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthieu Faron, Maurice Cheugoua-Zanetsie, Jayne Tierney, Pierre Thirion, Matthew Nankivell, Kathryn Winter, Hong Yang, Joel Shapiro, Dewi Vernerey, B. Mark Smithers, Thomas Walsh, Guillaume Piessen, Magnus Nilsson, Jurjen Boonstra, Marc Ychou, Simon Law, David Cunningham, Florent de Vathaire, Michael Stahl, Susan Urba, Michele Valmasoni, Danièle Williaume, Janine Thomas, Florian Lordick, Joel Tepper, Jack Roth, Val Gebski, Bryan Burmeister, Xavier Paoletti, Johanna van Sandick, Jianhua Fu, Jean-Pierre Pignon, Michel Ducreux, Stefan Michiels, Chanvitan Apinop, Anne Arezina, Emilie Barbier, Gary Bass, Pierre Blanchard, Jurjen Boonstra, Jean-François Bosset, Bryan H. Burmeister, Armel Maurice Cheugoua-Zanetsie, David Cunningham, Michel Ducreux, Matthieu Faron, Jianhua Fu, Val Gebski, D. J. Girling, David Kelsen, Fredrik Klevebro, Simon Law, Elisabeth Le Prise, Florian Lordick, Tanaphon Maipang, Murielle Mauer, Stefan Michiels, Jennifer Moughan, Matthew Nankivell, Knut Nygaard, Patrick Owens, Xavier Paoletti, Guillaume Piessen, Jean Pierre Pignon, Jean-Luc Raoul, Jack Roth, Alberto Ruol, Peter Schlag, Christoph Schumacher, Joel Shapiro, B. Mark Smithers, Michael Stahl, Joel Tepper, Pierre Thirion, Janine M. Thomas, Jayne Tierney, Susan Urba, Michele Valmasoni, Ate van der Gaast, Johanna van Sandick, Danièle Williaume, Kathryn Winter, John Wong, Hong Yang, Marc Ychou

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 15 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Decision Sciences 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 14 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2026.
All research outputs
#802,528
of 34,640,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#1,932
of 32,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,981
of 398,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#53
of 1,022 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,640,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,022 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.