You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
OME-Zarr: a cloud-optimized bioimaging file format with international community support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00418-023-02209-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josh Moore, Daniela Basurto-Lozada, Sébastien Besson, John Bogovic, Jordão Bragantini, Eva M. Brown, Jean-Marie Burel, Xavier Casas Moreno, Gustavo de Medeiros, Erin E. Diel, David Gault, Satrajit S. Ghosh, Ilan Gold, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Matthew Hartley, Dave Horsfall, Mark S. Keller, Mark Kittisopikul, Gabor Kovacs, Aybüke Küpcü Yoldaş, Koji Kyoda, Albane le Tournoulx de la Villegeorges, Tong Li, Prisca Liberali, Dominik Lindner, Melissa Linkert, Joel Lüthi, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard, Trevor Manz, Luca Marconato, Matthew McCormick, Merlin Lange, Khaled Mohamed, William Moore, Nils Norlin, Wei Ouyang, Bugra Özdemir, Giovanni Palla, Constantin Pape, Lucas Pelkmans, Tobias Pietzsch, Stephan Preibisch, Martin Prete, Norman Rzepka, Sameeul Samee, Nicholas Schaub, Hythem Sidky, Ahmet Can Solak, David R. Stirling, Jonathan Striebel, Christian Tischer, Daniel Toloudis, Isaac Virshup, Petr Walczysko, Alan M. Watson, Erin Weisbart, Frances Wong, Kevin A. Yamauchi, Omer Bayraktar, Beth A. Cimini, Nils Gehlenborg, Muzlifah Haniffa, Nathan Hotaling, Shuichi Onami, Loic A. Royer, Stephan Saalfeld, Oliver Stegle, Fabian J. Theis, Jason R. Swedlow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Germany | 5 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 5% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 56% |
| Scientists | 24 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#971,447
of 25,383,344 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#6
of 1,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,287
of 354,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,383,344 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.