↓ Skip to main content

Structure of Human cGAS Reveals a Conserved Family of Second-Messenger Enzymes in Innate Immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Reports, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
31 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
354 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Structure of Human cGAS Reveals a Conserved Family of Second-Messenger Enzymes in Innate Immunity
Published in
Cell Reports, May 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Innate immune recognition of foreign nucleic acids induces protective interferon responses. Detection of cytosolic DNA triggers downstream immune signaling through activation of cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS). We report here the crystal structure of human cGAS, revealing an unanticipated zinc-ribbon DNA-binding domain appended to a core enzymatic nucleotidyltransferase scaffold. The catalytic core of cGAS is structurally homologous to the RNA-sensing enzyme, 2'-5' oligo-adenylate synthase (OAS), and divergent C-terminal domains account for specific ligand-activation requirements of each enzyme. We show that the cGAS zinc ribbon is essential for STING-dependent induction of the interferon response and that conserved amino acids displayed within the intervening loops are required for efficient cytosolic DNA recognition. These results demonstrate that cGAS and OAS define a family of innate immunity sensors and that structural divergence from a core nucleotidyltransferase enables second-messenger responses to distinct foreign nucleic acids.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 354 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 345 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 20%
Researcher 59 17%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Master 26 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 5%
Other 38 11%
Unknown 102 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 89 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 8%
Chemistry 25 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 4%
Other 19 5%
Unknown 103 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2026.
All research outputs
#4,164,129
of 32,721,978 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#7,529
of 16,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,763
of 233,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#36
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,721,978 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.