You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
過剰適応に関するメタ認知的・道具的信念尺度の作成および信頼性・妥当性の検討-健常大学生を対象にして
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Behavioral Medicine, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.11331/jjbm.28.13 |
| Authors |
松田 尚実, 富田 望, 南出 歩美, 熊野 宏昭 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 43% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#3,143,001
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 59 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,091
of 355,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 59 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them