| Title |
Why test study: a UK-wide audit using the Primary Care Academic CollaboraTive to explore the reasons for primary care testing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0191 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica Watson, Alexander Burrell, Polly Duncan, Ian Bennett-Britton, Sam Hodgson, Samuel WD Merriel, Salman Waqar, Penny F Whiting, The Primary care Academic CollaboraTive |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 123 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 52 | 42% |
| Spain | 11 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Cabo Verde | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 51 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 82 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 15% |
| Scientists | 17 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 107. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#402,408
of 25,809,907 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#157
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,132
of 368,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#2
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.