↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
108 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
guideline
3 clinical guideline sources
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Early Rule-Out Pathways for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published in
Circulation, December 2016
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.116.025021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 12%
Other 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 52 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Psychology 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Physics and Astronomy 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 57 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2026.
All research outputs
#499,150
of 34,566,597 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#1,364
of 28,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,936
of 463,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#26
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,566,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.