You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lobar quantification of pulmonary perfusion prior to minimally invasive lung reduction improves prediction of postprocedure outcomes: A pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Physiology & Functional Imaging, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cpf.12847 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kritika Subramanian, Brett Muench, Eugene Shostak, Amanda Coffey, Lady Sawoszczyk, Fei Gao, Adam Leep, Ramya Rajaram, John Hornung, Elisabeth O'Dwyer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#14,798,870
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Physiology & Functional Imaging
#372
of 697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,327
of 364,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Physiology & Functional Imaging
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.