You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Risk–Benefit Analysis of the 9-Valent HPV Vaccination for Adolescent Boys from an Individual Perspective
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, July 2021
|
DOI | 10.7883/yoken.jjid.2021.367 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taito Kitano |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 27% |
Researcher | 1 | 9% |
Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases
#153
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,367
of 441,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.