↓ Skip to main content

Model Estimation of Energy Flow in Oregon Coastal Seabird Populations

Overview of attention for article published in Ornithological Applications, January 1975
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Model Estimation of Energy Flow in Oregon Coastal Seabird Populations
Published in
Ornithological Applications, January 1975
DOI 10.2307/1366091
Authors

John A. Wiens, J. Michael Scott

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Master 7 18%
Other 4 10%
Professor 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 70%
Environmental Science 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#693
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,047
of 20,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 20,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.