↓ Skip to main content

Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the detection of tears of the supraspinatus central tendon on MRI by shoulder surgeons

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of the detection of tears of the supraspinatus central tendon on MRI by shoulder surgeons
Published in
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.011
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliability of detecting full- and partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus intramuscular central tendon on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) by orthopaedic shoulder surgeons. Full-thickness tears of this tendon have previously been associated with the failure of nonsurgical management of rotator cuff tears.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 6%
Other 16 25%
Unknown 14 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Mathematics 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 20 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2013.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
#2,468
of 3,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,955
of 192,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.