↓ Skip to main content

橋出血により感覚機能と注意機能に低下を認めた症例に対して注意の外的焦点化と内的焦点化に着目した理学療法を行った経験

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Therapy Japan, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
橋出血により感覚機能と注意機能に低下を認めた症例に対して注意の外的焦点化と内的焦点化に着目した理学療法を行った経験
Published in
Physical Therapy Japan, August 2023
DOI 10.15063/rigaku.12370
Authors

佐藤 佑太郎, 松田 涼, 石川 直人, 山田 尚幸, 松田 直樹

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,387,842
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy Japan
#71
of 295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,277
of 361,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy Japan
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 295 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them