Insects are involved in a multitude of interactions with other organisms, which make them ideal models for large-scale cophylogenetic studies. Once phylogenies of interacting lineages have been inferred, there are a number of questions we may wish to ask, such as what was the relationship between the partners in the past? Have they co-evolved for thousands or millions of years, or has one of the partners switched among different host species? To answer such questions, researchers may conduct cophylogenetic analysis, to explore the relationships between the phylogenies of interacting lineages and determine whether the match is significant or find explanations for observed differences. When combined with dating analyses, cophylogenetic analyses may support cospeciation of the partners or phylogenetic tracking. As they may reveal dynamics of host-pathogen coevolution, cophylogenetic studies may also help tackle global health issues (e.g. document the spread of disease causing pathogens). Cophylogenetic studies of parasitoids and their insect hosts may also help identify effective biocontrol agents. With the advent of next generation sequencing technologies and keeping in mind that systematic errors may occur, cophylogenetics will benefit from better-resolved trees, allowing more accurate reconciliation. However as trees become larger, current algorithms also become more computationally challenging. Nevertheless, both theoretical and methodological developments are leading to more accurate and powerful tests of cospeciation through cophylogenetic analysis.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,028,164
of 26,789,368 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Insect Science
#568
of 836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,986
of 313,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Insect Science
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,789,368 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 836 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
