↓ Skip to main content

Highly Sensitive 3-Tesla Real Inversion Recovery MRI Detects Leptomeningeal Contrast Enhancement in Chronic Active Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Investigative Radiology, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 2,023)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Highly Sensitive 3-Tesla Real Inversion Recovery MRI Detects Leptomeningeal Contrast Enhancement in Chronic Active Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Investigative Radiology, March 2024
DOI 10.1097/rli.0000000000001011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serhat Vahip Okar, Henry Dieckhaus, Erin S Beck, María I Gaitán, Gina Norato, Dzung L Pham, Martina Absinta, Irene Cm Cortese, Anita Fletcher, Steven Jacobson, Govind Nair, Daniel S Reich

Abstract

Leptomeningeal contrast enhancement (LME) on T2-weighted Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (T2-FLAIR) MRI is a reported marker of leptomeningeal inflammation, which is known to be associated with progression of multiple sclerosis (MS). However, this MRI approach, as typically implemented on clinical 3-tesla (T) systems, detects only a few enhancing foci in ~25% of patients and has thus been criticized as poorly sensitive. To compare an optimized 3D real-reconstruction inversion recovery (Real-IR) MRI sequence on a clinical 3 T scanner to T2-FLAIR for prevalence, characteristics, and clinical/radiological correlations of LME. We obtained 3D T2-FLAIR and Real-IR scans before and after administration of standard-dose gadobutrol in 177 scans of 154 participants (98 women, 64%; mean ± SD age: 49 ± 12 years), including 124 with an MS-spectrum diagnosis, 21 with other neurological and/or inflammatory disorders, and 9 without neurological history. We calculated contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) in 20 representative LME foci and determined association of LME with cortical lesions identified at 7 T (n = 19), paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) at 3 T (n = 105), and clinical/demographic data. We observed focal LME in 73% of participants on Real-IR (70% in established MS, 33% in healthy volunteers, P < 0.0001), compared to 33% on T2-FLAIR (34% vs. 11%, P = 0.0002). Real-IR showed 3.7-fold more LME foci than T2-FLAIR (P = 0.001), including all T2-FLAIR foci. LME CNR was 2.5-fold higher by Real-IR (P < 0.0001). The major determinant of LME status was age. Although LME was not associated with cortical lesions, the number of PRL was associated with the number of LME foci on both T2-FLAIR (P = 0.003) and Real-IR (P = 0.0003) after adjusting for age, sex, and white matter lesion volume. Real-IR a promising tool to detect, characterize, and understand the significance of LME in MS. The association between PRL and LME highlights a possible role of the leptomeninges in sustaining chronic inflammation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,259,582
of 25,984,008 outputs
Outputs from Investigative Radiology
#35
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,680
of 342,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigative Radiology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,984,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them