You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive refutation of the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis (YDIH)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth-Science Reviews, December 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104502 |
| Authors |
Vance T. Holliday, Tyrone L. Daulton, Patrick J. Bartlein, Mark B. Boslough, Ryan P. Breslawski, Abigail E. Fisher, Ian A. Jorgeson, Andrew C. Scott, Christian Koeberl, Jennifer R. Marlon, Jeffrey Severinghaus, Michail I. Petaev, Philippe Claeys |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 332 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 89 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 5% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Canada | 7 | 2% |
| Germany | 5 | 2% |
| Sweden | 4 | 1% |
| Norway | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 169 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 261 | 79% |
| Scientists | 65 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Energy | 1 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 268. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#137,734
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Earth-Science Reviews
#17
of 1,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,177
of 366,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth-Science Reviews
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.