You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ALSUntangled #71: Nuedexta
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1080/21678421.2023.2239292 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuyao Sun, Michael Benatar, Javier Mascías Cadavid, Dave Ennist, Paul Wicks, Kim Staats, Morgan Beauchamp, Sartaj Jhooty, Gary Pattee, Andrew Brown, Tulio Bertorini, Paul Barkhaus, Mark Bromberg, Greg Carter, Richard Bedlack, Xiaoyan Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,205,185
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
#179
of 1,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,772
of 360,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.