↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying disparate questioning of Black and White jurors in capital jury selection

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 333)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantifying disparate questioning of Black and White jurors in capital jury selection
Published in
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, July 2023
DOI 10.1111/jels.12357
Authors

Anna Effenberger, John H. Blume, Martin T. Wells

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,016,577
of 24,346,461 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
#16
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,974
of 327,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,346,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them