You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimization Techniques for Model Checking Leads-to Properties in a Stratified Way
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1145/3604610 |
| Authors |
Canh Minh, Yati Phyo, Adrián Riesco, Kazuhiro Ogata |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 75% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 75% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#791,889
of 24,529,782 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
#3
of 304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,848
of 167,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,529,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 304 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them