You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
雜録
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Plant Research, January 1890
|
| DOI | 10.15281/jplantres1887.4.40_230 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 44 | 30% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Liechtenstein | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 147 | 99% |
| Scientists | 2 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2023.
All research outputs
#358,209
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Plant Research
#9
of 1,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2
of 1,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Plant Research
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,188 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.