↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adoption of antenatal care conversation mapping among health care providers in Saudi Arabia: Application of the diffusion innovation theory
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2023
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0286656
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anwar Alhashem, Bayader A Alotaiby, Rahaf B Al Thobaiti, Mudhi M Almaktoomi, Shahad I Alzahrani, Alia A Albaiz, Basil H Aboul-Enein, Nada Benajiba

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 16%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 16 50%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 18 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,404,230
of 24,166,768 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#143,793
of 207,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,734
of 349,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#4,984
of 5,441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,166,768 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.