↓ Skip to main content

Lifetime Trauma, Praying for Others, and C-Reactive Protein

Overview of attention for article published in Biodemography and Social Biology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Lifetime Trauma, Praying for Others, and C-Reactive Protein
Published in
Biodemography and Social Biology, November 2016
DOI 10.1080/19485565.2016.1188367
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Research indicates that praying for others may offset the effects of stress on self-rated health and psychological well-being. The purpose of the current study is to extend this literature by seeing whether praying for others moderates the effects of exposure to lifetime trauma on a key marker of inflammation: C-reactive protein. The data come from a recent nationwide survey of adults of all ages (N = 1,589). Levels of C-reactive protein were obtained from assays of blood spots drawn from a capillary fingerstick. The findings suggest that the magnitude of the relationship between lifetime trauma and C-reactive protein is completely offset for study participants who frequently pray for others. The theoretical implications of this research are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 12%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,750,628
of 27,614,662 outputs
Outputs from Biodemography and Social Biology
#232
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,857
of 313,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodemography and Social Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,614,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them