You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic erosion in an endangered desert fish during a megadrought despite long‐term supportive breeding
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Biology, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1111/cobi.14154 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Megan J. Osborne, Thomas P. Archdeacon, Charles B. Yackulic, Robert K. Dudley, Guilherme Caeiro‐Dias, Thomas F. Turner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 60% |
| Sweden | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 31% |
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 4 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#14,389,241
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Biology
#3,520
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,096
of 353,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Biology
#27
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.