↓ Skip to main content

Phenotypic clues that predict underlying cytogenetic/genetic abnormalities in myeloid malignancies: A contemporary review

Overview of attention for article published in Cytopathology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 820)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
96 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phenotypic clues that predict underlying cytogenetic/genetic abnormalities in myeloid malignancies: A contemporary review
Published in
Cytopathology, July 2023
DOI 10.1111/cyt.13280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Stone, Cullen M. Lilley, Guilin Tang, Sanam Loghavi, Kamran M. Mirza

Abstract

Precise subclassification of myeloid malignancies per the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system and the International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukaemias (ICC) requires investigation and documentation of the presence of cytogenetic and/or molecular genetic changes. These ancillary studies not only help in diagnosis, but also the prognosis of disease; however, they take time to be completed. In contrast, morphological evaluation of material from the blood and bone marrow specimens of cases where myeloid malignancies are suspected is usually completed quickly. Cytomorphological assessment may predict genetic changes and can be helpful in triaging acuity. This is especially true in haematological emergencies such as acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL), where prompt APL-specific therapy can be life changing. Similarly, some morphological clues may help identify core binding factor leukaemias where a diagnosis of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) could be rendered without reaching the 20% blast cutoff with immediate treatment-decision implications, or even a subset of cases of AML with FLT3 ITD/NPM1 mutation(s) which show characteristic features. Even though FISH/cytogenetics and/or PCR are still required for establishing the final diagnosis, evaluation for the presence of specific cytomorphological features that help predict genetic changes can be a useful tool to help guide early therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#688,745
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Cytopathology
#3
of 820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,911
of 362,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytopathology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 820 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.