You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The importance of cryptic species and subspecific populations in classic biological control of weeds: a North American perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioControl, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10526-017-9859-z |
| Authors |
Lincoln Smith, Massimo Cristofaro, Marie-Claude Bon, Alessio De Biase, Radmila Petanović, Biljana Vidović |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#8,041,594
of 24,174,783 outputs
Outputs from BioControl
#140
of 472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,556
of 447,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioControl
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,174,783 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.