You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
LA-ICP-MSによる火山ガラスの微量成分元素組成に基づくテフラの対比:銭亀‒女那川テフラ(Z-M)を例として
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.18940/kazan.68.2_91 |
| Authors |
岡田 里奈, 近藤 美左紀, 梅田 浩司, 古澤 明, 天野 格 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#15,840,332
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#128
of 211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,511
of 364,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.