You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Proteogenomic analysis of chemo-refractory high-grade serous ovarian cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.004 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shrabanti Chowdhury, Jacob J Kennedy, Richard G Ivey, Oscar D Murillo, Noshad Hosseini, Xiaoyu Song, Francesca Petralia, Anna Calinawan, Sara R Savage, Anna B Berry, Boris Reva, Umut Ozbek, Azra Krek, Weiping Ma, Felipe da Veiga Leprevost, Jiayi Ji, Seungyeul Yoo, Chenwei Lin, Uliana J Voytovich, Yajue Huang, Sun-Hee Lee, Lindsay Bergan, Travis D Lorentzen, Mehdi Mesri, Henry Rodriguez, Andrew N Hoofnagle, Zachary T Herbert, Alexey I Nesvizhskii, Bing Zhang, Jeffrey R Whiteaker, David Fenyo, Wilson McKerrow, Joshua Wang, Stephan C Schürer, Vasileios Stathias, X Steven Chen, Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff, Timothy K Starr, Boris J Winterhoff, Andrew C Nelson, Samuel C Mok, Scott H Kaufmann, Charles Drescher, Marcin Cieslik, Pei Wang, Michael J Birrer, Amanda G Paulovich |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 47% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 53% |
| Scientists | 14 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 56 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 57 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 145. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2024.
All research outputs
#355,625
of 34,306,620 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#1,849
of 19,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,970
of 388,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#47
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,306,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,550 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.