↓ Skip to main content

A World of Lies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,002)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
14 X users
reddit
4 Redditors
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A World of Lies
Published in
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, January 2006
DOI 10.1177/0022022105282295
Pubmed ID
Authors

The Global Deception Research Team

Abstract

This article reports two worldwide studies of stereotypes about liars. These studies are carried out in 75 different countries and 43 different languages. In Study 1, participants respond to the open-ended question "How can you tell when people are lying?" In Study 2, participants complete a questionnaire about lying. These two studies reveal a dominant pan-cultural stereotype: that liars avert gaze. The authors identify other common beliefs and offer a social control interpretation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 228 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 18%
Student > Master 42 18%
Researcher 29 12%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 39 16%
Unknown 45 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 126 53%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 4%
Linguistics 7 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 3%
Other 20 8%
Unknown 58 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 299. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2026.
All research outputs
#146,589
of 34,408,222 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
#5
of 1,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249
of 236,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,408,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them