↓ Skip to main content

How and when to use iSGLT2 (gliflozins) in clinical practice: a consensus for clinical practice proposed by the SFD, the SFC, the CNCF and the SFNDT

Overview of attention for article published in Néphrologie & Thérapeutique, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How and when to use iSGLT2 (gliflozins) in clinical practice: a consensus for clinical practice proposed by the SFD, the SFC, the CNCF and the SFNDT
Published in
Néphrologie & Thérapeutique, July 2023
DOI 10.1684/ndt.2023.25
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Diévart, Patrice Darmon, Jean-Michel Halimi, Samy Hadjadj, Denis Angoulvant, Gaétan Prévost, Pierre Delanaye, Jean-Marc Boivin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2023.
All research outputs
#15,533,143
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Néphrologie & Thérapeutique
#106
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,642
of 350,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Néphrologie & Thérapeutique
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them