↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Frequency and extent of CD30 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and its relation to clinical and biologic factors: a retrospective study of 167 cases
Published in
Leukemia & Lymphoma, April 2013
DOI 10.3109/10428194.2013.778407
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that CD30 may be expressed in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs). However, the prevalence of CD30 + DLBCLs and extent of CD30 expression within an individual tumor have not been fully evaluated. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and extent of CD30 expression in DLBCLs, and explore possible relationships between CD30 expression and clinical and biologic variables. We retrospectively identified and analyzed 167 cases of CD30 + DLBCLs from our pathology archive. Twenty-one percent (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.8-27.1%) of these cases expressed CD30, and in 52% of them CD30 was positive in > 80% of tumor cells. CD30 expression was more frequent in DLBCLs with non-germinal center origin phenotype, BCL2 + DLBCLs and in patients ≤ 47 years old. There was significant interaction of BCL2 expression with age and subtype of DLBCL. A multivariate analysis performed in BCL2 + DLBCLs showed a higher frequency of CD30 + cases in non-germinal center DLBCLs (odds ratio [OR]: 6.5, 95% CI: 1.1-36.5) and in patients ≤ 47 years old (OR: 6.9, 95% CI: 1.5-29.5). These associations could suggest a common biologic pathogenesis. The effectiveness of anti-CD30 drugs in other lymphomas opens the possibility for their use in patients with CD30 + DLBCLs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Denmark 1 3%
Unknown 30 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 16%
Researcher 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2016.
All research outputs
#9,000,113
of 26,587,829 outputs
Outputs from Leukemia & Lymphoma
#1,030
of 4,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,408
of 214,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leukemia & Lymphoma
#14
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,587,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.