You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preparation of LiFePO4/C composites by co-precipitation in molten stearic acid
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Power Sources, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.072 |
| Authors |
Dragana Jugović, Miodrag Mitrić, Maja Kuzmanović, Nikola Cvjetićanin, Srečo Škapin, Božidar Cekić, Valentin Ivanovski, Dragan Uskoković |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Serbia | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 23% |
| Researcher | 11 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 12 | 26% |
| Chemistry | 8 | 17% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 13% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Power Sources
#2,593
of 9,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,384
of 121,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Power Sources
#36
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,671 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.