↓ Skip to main content

Medical Students’ Perceptions and Knowledge About Antimicrobial Stewardship: How Are We Educating Our Future Prescribers?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
350 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Medical Students’ Perceptions and Knowledge About Antimicrobial Stewardship: How Are We Educating Our Future Prescribers?
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, May 2013
DOI 10.1093/cid/cit370
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Better understanding of medical students' perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge about antimicrobial prescribing practices could facilitate more effective education of these future prescribers.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 350 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 341 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Researcher 36 10%
Student > Master 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Student > Postgraduate 22 6%
Other 70 20%
Unknown 118 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 38 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 3%
Other 33 9%
Unknown 128 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,230,967
of 32,375,021 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#4,068
of 20,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,178
of 231,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#26
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,375,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.