↓ Skip to main content

Engaging primary care in CKD initiatives: the UK experience

Overview of attention for article published in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Engaging primary care in CKD initiatives: the UK experience
Published in
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, October 2012
DOI 10.1093/ndt/gfs103
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Over the last decade, since the introduction of an international classification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the development of simple tools to detect people with CKD, primary care has had to adapt to a new paradigm of disease. Significantly, improved identification of CKD, and increased awareness and understanding of the potential associated adverse outcomes, has in turn required the development, implementation and integration of new policies, models and pathways of care. The UK health care system, including primary care, is uniquely positioned to respond to new initiatives. Despite early reservations, CKD has gone from an unheard of condition in primary care prior to 2006 to one where people with this condition are recorded in disease registers and increasingly managed in accordance with evidence-based guidance. National and local initiatives implemented together have contributed to the improved understanding and management of CKD in primary care in the UK and are showing signs of having made significant health gains in CKD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 13%
Psychology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2013.
All research outputs
#15,272,611
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
#4,694
of 5,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,324
of 184,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
#52
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.