↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of Personality Trait Change Through Intervention

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Bulletin, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 2,619)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
923 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Systematic Review of Personality Trait Change Through Intervention
Published in
Psychological Bulletin, February 2017
DOI 10.1037/bul0000088
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The current meta-analysis investigated the extent to which personality traits changed as a result of intervention, with the primary focus on clinical interventions. We identified 207 studies that had tracked changes in measures of personality traits during interventions, including true experiments and prepost change designs. Interventions were associated with marked changes in personality trait measures over an average time of 24 weeks (e.g., d = .37). Additional analyses showed that the increases replicated across experimental and nonexperimental designs, for nonclinical interventions, and persisted in longitudinal follow-ups of samples beyond the course of intervention. Emotional stability was the primary trait domain showing changes as a result of therapy, followed by extraversion. The type of therapy employed was not strongly associated with the amount of change in personality traits. Patients presenting with anxiety disorders changed the most, and patients being treated for substance use changed the least. The relevance of the results for theory and social policy are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 923 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Macao 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 911 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 138 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 115 12%
Student > Master 106 11%
Researcher 61 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 57 6%
Other 152 16%
Unknown 294 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 394 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 3%
Social Sciences 28 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 28 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 2%
Other 95 10%
Unknown 333 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 790. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2026.
All research outputs
#30,473
of 34,408,222 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Bulletin
#20
of 2,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#503
of 470,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Bulletin
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,408,222 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.