↓ Skip to main content

Predatory Inclusion and Education Debt: Rethinking the Racial Wealth Gap

Overview of attention for article published in Social Currents, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 261)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
62 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
112 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor
bluesky
4 Bluesky users
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Predatory Inclusion and Education Debt: Rethinking the Racial Wealth Gap
Published in
Social Currents, January 2017
DOI 10.1177/2329496516686620
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 112 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 13%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Master 7 8%
Lecturer 6 7%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 38 43%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 8%
Computer Science 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 625. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2026.
All research outputs
#45,265
of 34,547,233 outputs
Outputs from Social Currents
#1
of 261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#799
of 464,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Currents
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,547,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 464,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them