↓ Skip to main content

Ten-Year Review of Major Birth Defects in VLBW Infants

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Ten-Year Review of Major Birth Defects in VLBW Infants
Published in
Pediatrics, July 2013
DOI 10.1542/peds.2012-3111
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Birth defects (BDs) are an important cause of infant mortality and disproportionately occur among low birth weight infants. We determined the prevalence of BDs in a cohort of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants cared for at the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (NRN) centers over a 10-year period and examined the relationship between anomalies, neonatal outcomes, and surgical care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 6 8%
Other 22 29%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Psychology 5 7%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#10,351,676
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#13,958
of 22,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,585
of 237,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#152
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.