You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessment of population structure and genetic diversity of wild and captive populations of Ammotragus lervia provide insights for conservation management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Conservation Genetics, August 2023
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10592-023-01546-x |
Authors |
Cristian Pizzigalli, Teresa Luísa Silva, Teresa Abáigar, Giorgio Bertorelle, Jorge Cassinello, José Carlos Brito |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 67% |
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 2 | 67% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,766,397
of 24,356,663 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#80
of 1,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,569
of 239,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,356,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.