↓ Skip to main content

Infants Admitted to US Intensive Care Units for RSV Infection During the 2022 Seasonal Peak

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Network Open, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
85 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors
bluesky
36 Bluesky users
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Infants Admitted to US Intensive Care Units for RSV Infection During the 2022 Seasonal Peak
Published in
JAMA Network Open, August 2023
DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.28950
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natasha Halasa, Laura D. Zambrano, Justin Z. Amarin, Laura S. Stewart, Margaret M. Newhams, Emily R. Levy, Steven L. Shein, Christopher L. Carroll, Julie C. Fitzgerald, Marian G. Michaels, Katherine Bline, Melissa L. Cullimore, Laura Loftis, Vicki L. Montgomery, Asumthia S. Jeyapalan, Pia S. Pannaraj, Adam J. Schwarz, Natalie Z. Cvijanovich, Matt S. Zinter, Aline B. Maddux, Melania M. Bembea, Katherine Irby, Danielle M. Zerr, Joseph D. Kuebler, Christopher J. Babbitt, Mary Glas Gaspers, Ryan A. Nofziger, Michele Kong, Bria M. Coates, Jennifer E. Schuster, Shira J. Gertz, Elizabeth H. Mack, Benjamin R. White, Helen Harvey, Charlotte V. Hobbs, Heda Dapul, Andrew D. Butler, Tamara T. Bradford, Courtney M. Rowan, Kari Wellnitz, Mary Allen Staat, Cassyanne L. Aguiar, Saul R. Hymes, Adrienne G. Randolph, Angela P. Campbell, Merry Tomcany, Kelly N. Michelson, Heather E. Price, Ronald C. Sanders, Lexie Dixon, Katri V. Typpo, Ilana Harwayne-Gidansky, Suden Kucukak, Elizabeth R. McNamara, Sabrina R. Chen, Eve Listerud, Ofelia Vargas-Shiraishi, Betty Oberle, Frances Zorensky, Rachel Mansour, Jaycee Jumarang, Marla Johnston, Jenny L. Bush, Shawn Dickey, Shannon Hill, Melissa Sullivan, Abigail Kietzman, Candice Colston, Meghan Murdock, Heather Kelley, Laura Wright-Sexton, Maygan Martin, Lora Martin, Lacy Malloch, Kayla Patterson, Cameron Sanders, Chelsea Rohlfs, Marilyn Rice, Miranda Howard, Makayla Murphy, Vijaya L. Soma, Adam J. Ratner, Megan J. Job, Colleen Mennie, Kamala Simkhada, Noelle M. Drapeau, Supriya Behl, Kristina A. Betters, Haya Hayek, Molly Maranto, Aubrie Waters, Maggie Flowers, Kevin Havlin, Jamie Furlong-Dillard, Melissa Porter, Jennifer Nason, Madison Ray, Kristen Gossett, Hillary Crandall, Evan Heller, Jennifer Foley, Rajashri Rasal, Christine Marlow, Anurithi Senthil, Kimberly Myers, Betsy Tudor, Amanda Adler, Nereyda Garcia, Natalie Treister, Patrick S. McQuillen, Kathleen Sun, Denise Villarreal-Chico, Sophia Kainaroi, John V. Williams

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the leading cause of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) and infant hospitalization worldwide. To evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of RSV-related critical illness in US infants during peak 2022 RSV transmission. This cross-sectional study used a public health prospective surveillance registry in 39 pediatric hospitals across 27 US states. Participants were infants admitted for 24 or more hours between October 17 and December 16, 2022, to a unit providing intensive care due to laboratory-confirmed RSV infection. Respiratory syncytial virus. Data were captured on demographics, clinical characteristics, signs and symptoms, laboratory values, severity measures, and clinical outcomes, including receipt of noninvasive respiratory support, invasive mechanical ventilation, vasopressors or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and death. Mixed-effects multivariable log-binomial regression models were used to assess associations between intubation status and demographic factors, gestational age, and underlying conditions, including hospital as a random effect to account for between-site heterogeneity. The first 15 to 20 consecutive eligible infants from each site were included for a target sample size of 600. Among the 600 infants, the median (IQR) age was 2.6 (1.4-6.0) months; 361 (60.2%) were male, 169 (28.9%) were born prematurely, and 487 (81.2%) had no underlying medical conditions. Primary reasons for admission included LRTI (594 infants [99.0%]) and apnea or bradycardia (77 infants [12.8%]). Overall, 143 infants (23.8%) received invasive mechanical ventilation (median [IQR], 6.0 [4.0-10.0] days). The highest level of respiratory support for nonintubated infants was high-flow nasal cannula (243 infants [40.5%]), followed by bilevel positive airway pressure (150 infants [25.0%]) and continuous positive airway pressure (52 infants [8.7%]). Infants younger than 3 months, those born prematurely (gestational age <37 weeks), or those publicly insured were at higher risk for intubation. Four infants (0.7%) received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 2 died. The median (IQR) length of hospitalization for survivors was 5 (4-10) days. In this cross-sectional study, most US infants who required intensive care for RSV LRTIs were young, healthy, and born at term. These findings highlight the need for RSV preventive interventions targeting all infants to reduce the burden of severe RSV illness.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Master 2 3%
Student > Postgraduate 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 35 58%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 34 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 718. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2026.
All research outputs
#35,868
of 34,602,467 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#440
of 15,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#735
of 383,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#24
of 536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,602,467 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 114.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.