You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Executive summary of the consensus statement of the group for the study of infection in transplantation and other immunocompromised host (GESITRA-IC) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) on the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant recipients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transplantation Reviews, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.trre.2023.100788 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabina Herrera, Jose M Aguado, Francisco Javier Candel, Elisa Cordero, Beatriz Domínguez-Gil, Mario Fernández-Ruiz, Ibai Los Arcos, Òscar Len, M Ángeles Marcos, Elena Muñez, Patricia Muñoz, Isabel Rodríguez-Goncer, Javier Sánchez-Céspedes, Maricela Valerio, Marta Bodro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 18 | 39% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 28% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,420,270
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Transplantation Reviews
#4
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,940
of 359,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transplantation Reviews
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them