↓ Skip to main content

The Dworkin–Williams debate: Liberty, conceptual integrity, and tragic conflict in politics

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 673)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Dworkin–Williams debate: Liberty, conceptual integrity, and tragic conflict in politics
Published in
Philosophy & Phenomenological Research, August 2023
DOI 10.1111/phpr.13002
Authors

Matthieu Queloz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 1 50%
Arts and Humanities 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,928,545
of 25,815,269 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
#28
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,142
of 360,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,815,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them