↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative Outcomes and Management in Pediatric Complex Cranial Vault Reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Perioperative Outcomes and Management in Pediatric Complex Cranial Vault Reconstruction
Published in
Anesthesiology, February 2017
DOI 10.1097/aln.0000000000001481
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul A. Stricker, Susan M. Goobie, Franklyn P. Cladis, Charles M. Haberkern, Petra M. Meier, Srijaya K. Reddy, Thanh T. Nguyen, Lingyu Cai, Marcia Polansky, Peter Szmuk, John Fiadjoe, Codruta Soneru, Ricardo Falcon, Timothy Petersen, Courtney Kowalczyk-Derderian, Nicholas Dalesio, Stefan Budac, Neels Groenewald, Daniel Rubens, Douglas Thompson, Rheana Watts, Katherine Gentry, Iskra Ivanova, Mali Hetmaniuk, Vincent Hsieh, Michael Collins, Karen Wong, Wendy Binstock, Russell Reid, Kim Poteet-Schwartz, Heike Gries, Rebecca Hall, Jeffrey Koh, Carolyn Bannister, Wai Sung, Ranu Jain, Allison Fernandez, Gerald F. Tuite, Ernesto Ruas, Oleg Drozhinin, Lisa Tetreault, Bridget Muldowney, Karene Ricketts, Patrick Fernandez, Lisa Sohn, John Hajduk, Brad Taicher, Jessica Burkhart, Allison Wright, Jane Kugler, Lea Barajas-DeLoa, Meera Gangadharan, Veronica Busso, Kayla Stallworth, Susan Staudt, Kristen L. Labovsky, Chris D. Glover, Henry Huang, Helena Karlberg-Hippard, Samantha Capehart, Cynthia Streckfus, Kim-Phuong T. Nguyen, Peter Manyang, Jose Luis Martinez, Jennifer K. Hansen, Heather Mitzel Levy, Alyssa Brzenski, Franklin Chiao, Pablo Ingelmo, Razaz Mujallid, Olutoyin A. Olutoye, Tariq Syed, Hubert Benzon, Adrian Bosenberg

Abstract

The Pediatric Craniofacial Collaborative Group established the Pediatric Craniofacial Surgery Perioperative Registry to elucidate practices and outcomes in children with craniosynostosis undergoing complex cranial vault reconstruction and inform quality improvement efforts. The aim of this study is to determine perioperative management, outcomes, and complications in children undergoing complex cranial vault reconstruction across North America and to delineate salient features of current practices. Thirty-one institutions contributed data from June 2012 to September 2015. Data extracted included demographics, perioperative management, length of stay, laboratory results, and blood management techniques employed. Complications and outlier events were described. Outcomes analyzed included total blood donor exposures, intraoperative and perioperative transfusion volumes, and length of stay outcomes. One thousand two hundred twenty-three cases were analyzed: 935 children aged less than or equal to 24 months and 288 children aged more than 24 months. Ninety-five percent of children aged less than or equal to 24 months and 79% of children aged more than 24 months received at least one transfusion. There were no deaths. Notable complications included cardiac arrest, postoperative seizures, unplanned postoperative mechanical ventilation, large-volume transfusion, and unplanned second surgeries. Utilization of blood conservation techniques was highly variable. The authors present a comprehensive description of perioperative management, outcomes, and complications from a large group of North American children undergoing complex cranial vault reconstruction. Transfusion remains the rule for the vast majority of patients. The occurrence of numerous significant complications together with large variability in perioperative management and outcomes suggest targets for improvement.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 22 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 55%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,488,222
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#1,935
of 6,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,889
of 430,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#34
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.