↓ Skip to main content

Reduced Corticotropin Releasing Factor Binding Sites in the Frontal Cortex of Suicide Victims

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of General Psychiatry, June 1988
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
patent
46 patents
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reduced Corticotropin Releasing Factor Binding Sites in the Frontal Cortex of Suicide Victims
Published in
Archives of General Psychiatry, June 1988
DOI 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800300075009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Previous studies have provided evidence that corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) is hypersecreted in patients with major depression. This CRF hypersecretion is believed to contribute at least in part to hyperactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in depressed patients. If CRF is chronically hypersecreted in depressed patients, then, due to down-regulation, a reduced number of CRF receptor binding sites should be present in patients with profound depressive disorder. To test this hypothesis, we measured the number and affinity of CRF binding sites in the frontal cortex of 26 suicide victims and 29 controls who died of a variety of causes. There was a marked (23%) reduction in the number of CRF binding sites in the frontal cortex of the suicide victims compared with the controls. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that CRF is hypersecreted in depression.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 114 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 15%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 18%
Psychology 19 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 13%
Neuroscience 14 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 38 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2026.
All research outputs
#2,495,396
of 33,704,742 outputs
Outputs from Archives of General Psychiatry
#786
of 3,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#420
of 18,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of General Psychiatry
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,704,742 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.