You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alignment of spatial genomics data using deep Gaussian processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41592-023-01972-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew Jones, F. William Townes, Didong Li, Barbara E. Engelhardt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 30% |
| China | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 62% |
| Scientists | 28 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 35% |
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 3% |
| Professor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 419. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2023.
All research outputs
#70,042
of 25,613,746 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#31
of 5,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,411
of 358,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#2
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,613,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.