↓ Skip to main content

Risks of Ventricular Arrhythmia and Heart Failure in Carriers of RBM20 Variants

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 1,071)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
68 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risks of Ventricular Arrhythmia and Heart Failure in Carriers of RBM20 Variants
Published in
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine, August 2023
DOI 10.1161/circgen.123.004059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas E. Cannie, Alexandros Protonotarios, Athanasios Bakalakos, Petros Syrris, Massimiliano Lorenzini, Bianca De Stavola, Louise Bjerregaard, Anne M. Dybro, Thomas M. Hey, Frederikke G. Hansen, Marina Navarro Peñalver, Maria G. Crespo-Leiro, Jose M. Larrañaga-Moreira, Fernando de Frutos, Renee Johnson, Thomas A. Slater, Lorenzo Monserrat, Anshuman Sengupta, Luisa Mestroni, Matthew R.G. Taylor, Gianfranco Sinagra, Zofia Bilinska, Itziar Solla-Ruiz, Xabier Arana Achaga, Roberto Barriales-Villa, Pablo Garcia-Pavia, Juan R. Gimeno, Matteo Dal Ferro, Marco Merlo, Karim Wahbi, Diane Fatkin, Jens Mogensen, Torsten B. Rasmussen, Perry M. Elliott

Abstract

Variants in RBM20 are reported in 2% to 6% of familial cases of dilated cardiomyopathy and may be associated with fatal ventricular arrhythmia and rapid heart failure progression. We sought to determine the risk of adverse events in RBM20 variant carriers and the impact of sex on outcomes. Consecutive probands and relatives carrying RBM20 variants were retrospectively recruited from 12 cardiomyopathy units. The primary end point was a composite of malignant ventricular arrhythmia (MVA) and end-stage heart failure (ESHF). MVA and ESHF end points were also analyzed separately and males and females compared. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) contemporary to MVA was examined. RBM20 variant carriers with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (RBM20LVSD) were compared with variant-elusive patients with idiopathic left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Longitudinal follow-up data were available for 143 RBM20 variant carriers (71 male; median age, 35.5 years); 7 of 143 had an MVA event at baseline. Thirty of 136 without baseline MVA (22.0%) reached the primary end point, and 16 of 136 (11.8%) had new MVA with no significant difference between males and females (log-rank P=0.07 and P=0.98, respectively). Twenty of 143 (14.0%) developed ESHF (17 males and 3 females; log-rank P<0.001). Four of 10 variant carriers with available LVEF contemporary to MVA had an LVEF >35%. At 5 years, 15 of 67 (22.4%) RBM20LVSD versus 7 of 197 (3.6%) patients with idiopathic left ventricular systolic dysfunction had reached the primary end point (log-rank P<0.001). RBM20 variant carriage conferred a 6.0-fold increase in risk of the primary end point. RBM20 variants are associated with a high risk of MVA and ESHF compared with idiopathic left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The risk of MVA in male and female RBM20 variant carriers is similar, but male sex is strongly associated with ESHF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 4 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 6 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2023.
All research outputs
#817,750
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#40
of 1,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,935
of 359,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.